Supreme Court Upholds Free Speech Rights in Donor Disclosure Case

Supreme Court Upholds Free Speech Rights in Donor Disclosure Case

On Thursday, in a landmark victory for the freedom of association, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Americans for Prosperity v. Bonta preventing California from forcing charitable organizations to disclose the identities and personal information of major donors.

At issue was a state regulation requiring such organizations to disclose their federal tax forms, which revealed the identities of their most generous contributors.

The state’s stated reasoning behind this requirement was to combat potential corruption, but critics recognize it as a scheme hatched by the liberals in control of California’s government to choke off funding to causes they oppose by exposing donors to reprisal.

Americans for Prosperity (AFP) took the case all the way to the Supreme Court.

AFP argued the First Amendment protects the right of donors to remain anonymous. Otherwise, as established in several cases from the 1950s and ’60s, supporters of groups with controversial views could be targeted for retribution, and their rights suppressed.

In particular, the group’s lawyers cited the case of NAACP v. Alabama, in which the justices held that an organization’s right of free association can be seriously infringed if its supporters are doxed.

AFP asserted the same protections should apply to charitable donors in the modern age, and a majority of the justices agreed.

The Freedom Foundation submitted an amicus curiae (“friend of the Court”) brief that helped guide the Court in reaching this important decision. In its brief, the Foundation argued that the disclosure of sensitive donor information only invites retribution by those with less tolerance of opinions or political positions that contradict their own.

The Freedom Foundation and its backers understand our country is strengthened by a diversity of viewpoints and advocacy that cannot be allowed to be overcome by trigger warnings, cancel culture or any attempt to force us into silence.

As reaffirmed in the Americans for Prosperity decision, First Amendment freedoms are bigger than any political games used against those defending public workers’ rights.

And with our recently announced national expansion, the Freedom Foundation will now be in a position not only to defend the First Amendment on the West Coast, but anywhere in the nation where workers’ rights are threatened by government union tyranny.

Litigation Counsel
Tim Snowball is a civil rights attorney with Freedom Foundation, where his practice is focused on protecting the First Amendment rights of government workers to make their own decisions about whether to join or support public sector unions. In addition to his legal practice, Tim is an advocate for education in the areas of American government, constitutional history, and the Rule of Law. To this end, he has participated in hundreds of media interviews, written viral op-eds and blog posts, and regularly delivers speeches and other presentations to groups across California. Tim is also a part-time coach for UC Davis School of Law’s Mock Trial Program, where he teaches students the ins and out of trial practice, and has successfully lead teams to national competitions for the past three years. Tim received a JD from the George Washington University Law School, a BA in American Politics and Government from UC Berkeley, and an AA in Political Science from Grossmont College. At GW, Tim served as Notes Editor on the Federal Circuit Bar Journal, Coach on the Mock Trial Skills Board, and received the President’s Volunteer Service Award and Pro Bono Service Award for volunteering over 500 hours of pro bono service. When not fighting to protect the First Amendment, you can find Tim with his nose stuck in a book, working out, watching movies, or spending time with family and friends.